Trump cannot deliver closing arguments at NY fraud trialTrump cannot deliver closing arguments at NY fraud trial

The court has determined that Donald Trump will not be able to directly deliver a final argument in his civil fraud trial, which is centred on claims made by the state attorney general. The judge’s decision was sparked by Trump’s legal team’s unwillingness to adhere to specific criteria aimed at preventing the former US president from changing his final address into anything like a “campaign speech”.

This big discovery occurred only one day before the anticipated closing arguments in the case. The case, filed by New York’s attorney general, accuses Trump of fraudulently increasing his net worth by billions. The purported motivation for this deception is to gain better loan conditions. The judge’s decision to limit Trump’s direct participation in the final argument complicates an already fraught legal struggle.

Justice Arthur Engoron has allowed Donald Trump permission to speak during the final arguments of his civil fraud trial, but only under certain circumstances. According to an email exchange revealed on the court’s docket, Trump must follow conventional guidelines that bar counsel from addressing extraneous topics. Engoron stressed that Trump cannot use the chance to conduct a campaign speech or level false charges against the court, lawyers, or personnel engaged in the case.

Engoron noted that under New York law, Trump does not have an absolute right to speak during closing arguments, but his attorneys are authorised to do so. The conversations concerning Trump’s probable closing arguments started on January 4, but his legal team did not agree to Engoron’s terms by the deadlines, resulting in three delays.

Alina Habba, Trump’s attorney, issued a statement dismissing Engoron’s injunction. In the continuing legal fight, New York Attorney General Letitia James is demanding approximately $370 million from Trump and his enterprises, which include his sons Donald Jr. and Eric Trump. Trump was held responsible for fraud in September, and the present part of the trial is mostly concerned with calculating the financial consequences.

Despite the legal issues, Trump remains a viable contender for the 2024 election. He has claimed that the trial interfered with his campaign schedule, which included court appearances to garner support. Throughout the hearings, Trump has continually denied any wrongdoing, referring to the matter as a political witch hunt and accusing James and Engoron of political prejudice.

The case, which centres on charges that Trump overvalued assets, is one of numerous legal challenges that the former president is facing. Trump faces four possible criminal prosecutions this year, including allegations linked to his efforts to overturn the 2020 election, the handling of confidential data, and hush money payments to a porn actress. Despite the legal difficulties, Trump has maintained his plea of not guilty in all counts.

Read More : NRA Wayne World lapierre head New York graft Trial

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *